PSD.15:4.8 - Refresh the affected offering and preserve an honest stop

Maintain a responsible source and use return for the current repertoire. Reopen an entry when new evidence, a source claim, changed Method semantics, participation or authority conditions, support, qualification window or receiving need can change its offering. A new publication date or a file rename alone is not such a change.

For a changed claim, identify its exact repertoire use and the consequence: preserved, narrowed, reopened for a new trial or source result, or withdrawn from that use. Preserve independent entries and the earlier evidence for its original conditions. If applicability remains unresolved, state the uncertainty rather than assigning an unsupported negative or positive status.

A changed service rule might restrict the human career-advising branch without changing organization or AI-domain truth. A new AI configuration may invalidate evidence for a software-assisted offering without changing the manual Method. If the reusable decision-support action itself changes, identify and assess that semantic change rather than hiding it as maintenance.

Use A.10 for a known bounded reliance, and A.10.1 when a changed source requires discovering and revalidating several actual receiving uses. Invoke G.11 for an admitted currentness or refresh-planning/reporting object when its conditions obtain, such as a relied-on evidence or selected set; it does not supply the new repertoire judgement or make every local entry a refresh-orchestration problem.

Close this repertoire question when the relevant offerings, conditions, source/evidence gaps and next uses are clear. Withdraw only the defeated use, not recoverable history or other supported uses. A still-unqualified new proposal can remain visible without being offered as established practice.