PSD.15:5.2 - Non-contested development advice and a new software assistant

An advisory service already supports formed development questions without a dispute workshop. Its repertoire includes a source-bounded recommendation Method: recover the recipient, holder and horizon; inspect qualified specialist results; compare only live alternatives under the declared scheme; return a warranted direction, retained set, probe, request, blocker or abstention; and keep the recipient’s choice separate.

A new drafting assistant formats the same qualified premises and flags missing fields. If the adviser still performs the same qualification, comparison and return, the changed object is support. The practice checks access, confidentiality, capability and output reliability for that support; it does not create a new Method merely because the model version changed.

A different proposal lets the assistant select a preferred development direction from its own generated ranking and omit unranked candidates. That changes the reusable comparison and stopping rule. The practice cannot import the manual Method’s evidence or call the proposal a harmless implementation detail.

The immediate repertoire decision is to retain the manual offering and withhold the stronger automated offering pending an exact candidate account, comparison basis and representative evidence. A useful trial must include an absent whole-arrangement result, an unclosed provider alternative, and an evaluation that covers configuration A while the request concerns B. Success means the return preserves the correct gap and independently useful content, not merely that the text is fluent or shorter.

The trial also has to cover the actual human professional-service conditions where present. Human career-assessment evidence does not establish an AI-holder result, and an organization’s allocation evidence does not establish a person’s learning transfer. No generic development-direction score bridges those differences.

This is repertoire work, not a recommendation for a particular client, authorization to deploy the assistant, or proof of the full opportunity-construction Method. A human or organizational recipient still makes its own later choice.