PSD.15:7 - Conformance Checklist
Recognition asks whether the missing result is a reusable repertoire offering rather than an engagement choice, one source update, a support repair or a current follow-up response. One corrected applicability line can be the complete useful result.
Assurance asks whether the offered Method or candidate and its claimed use are warranted by the actual source and trial evidence. A description can identify a way without proving fit; a constructed exercise can support feasibility without proving real-world effectiveness or transfer. Consequential trials and offerings retain their direct participant, competence, independence, safety, confidentiality and authority conditions.
| Check | Sufficient answer |
|---|---|
| Recurring use | Practitioner, situation, receiving result, material conditions and repertoire decision are bounded. |
| Method recovery | Actual reusable actions, joins and stops are recoverable; Method, candidate, description, support and local Work remain distinct. |
| Comparative development | A serious alternative and the changed mechanism or applicability claim are explicit, with effort and losses. |
| Source and evidence | Each action-changing offering has a claim-sized basis, qualification limits, contrary evidence and an honest gap where needed. |
| Trial claim | The comparator and representative conditions fit the claim; observation, feasibility, fit, causal effect and transfer are not conflated. |
| Current offering | Retained, narrowed, candidate, withheld or withdrawn uses are usable by the next practitioner and do not hide different outcomes. |
| Lineage and refresh | Derivation has a basis; unproved cultural links remain gaps; only affected offerings reopen and recoverable history remains. |
A failed check may narrow one offering or retain a candidate for investigation while other entries stay usable. Do not label the whole repertoire current merely because every row has a source link.