Jump to text
On this page
Copy and source
Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-14 19:58:00 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-14 19:58:38 UTC · last check 2026-10-15 02:50:18 UTC

PSDA.19:4.6 - Enter at the missing substantive result

Once the service boundary is adequate, identify what answer is still needed. Reuse current opportunity, characterization, reachability, and comparison results that cover this subject, configuration, use, and horizon.

If the receiving contribution or direction is unsettled, use the relevant construction pattern. If adequate directions exist, enter the actual PSDA alternatives, comparison, or recommendation question directly. PSDA.12, PSDA.1, PSDA.2, PSDA.3, PSDA.4, PSDA.13 become relevant only when participants, formulations, scope, models, Method choice, or facilitation can change the return; a formed question needs no workshop as an entry fee.

Use C.40.JF for a missing joint-reachability result and A.15.9 for an exact external premise. A service may be admissible while the evidence supports only a conditional set, request, or blocker. Keep the scope local: a missing provider comparison can block ranking all directions while an independent human-development result remains usable.

PSDA.14 supplies the bounded recommendation when that question is current. The later authorized direction choice remains separate. When the selected direction calls for human capability development, HCD.2 programme comparison, an optional programme recommendation, authorized programme choice and Learning Product Guide remain distinct further results. An existing programme-level comparison can be used directly for its programme question.