PSDA.6:7 - Conformance Checklist

• Values are attributed to the relevant subjects and receiving comparison, with representation limits intact.
• Objectives and possible means remain distinct at the grain that changes the decision.
• Repeated consequences are not counted twice; correlation alone does not justify deletion.
• Measures retain subject, scale, unit, horizon, evidence, proxy limits, and missingness.
• Binding conditions, aspirations, and unresolved authority questions are distinguished. A live merits question receives an appraisal of protective contribution and burden, with a supported recommendation and unchanged current force.
• Value transformations and weights have declared ranges and an elicitation basis; the chosen form is justified separately from fitting its parameters.
• The numerical family preserves the joint judgements, has a checked feasibility result, and distinguishes incomplete information from contradictory judgements or a failed form.
• Necessary and possible comparisons retain their quantifiers, ties and dependence on the same compatible model. A changed judgement reopens only dependent results unless it changes the form itself.
• Interactions and refusals to compensate are preserved.
• Any collective aggregation has an explicit basis; incompatible accounts remain visible otherwise.
• The return states partiality, dissent, direct-source gaps, and exact reopen conditions.
• A supported preference comparison covers only its attributed account and supplied consequences; authorization of the later choice and a claim of effect need their own grounds.