| Common basis and real difference | Alternatives need comparable questions, while their mechanisms and affected subjects can genuinely differ. |
| Detail and affordability | Transition, distribution, and dependencies may reverse a conclusion, while exhaustive modeling can miss the decision window. |
| Multiple values and synthesis | A recipient needs a usable comparison without losing protected conditions or incompatible value accounts. |
| Prediction and evidence | A conditional model can inform a future choice without becoming an observed or causal result. |
| Precision and partiality | Numerical relations can clarify a comparison, while absent or incompatible evidence may leave no defensible total order. |