Library / Research Method Practice Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:40:10 UTC

RMP.2:0.1 - Working Terms

Name in this patternWhat it denotes
research designA justified strategy connecting the qualified question to cases, units, materials, observations or sources, analysis intentions, method-appropriate criticism, validity threats, and a useful stop. A label, protocol template, report checklist, apparatus, or software package is not the design.
design familyA broad relation among question, evidence source, intervention or exposure, comparison, and criticism, such as experimental/quantitative, field/observational, qualitative/reflexive, historical/source-critical, computational/model, synthesis, or an explicit mixed composition. Family names do not erase domain variants.
criticism logicThe design’s account of which material error, rival explanation, source failure, dependence, bias, or unsupported transfer can be exposed, by which contrast or challenge, and what result would defeat or narrow the claim.
serious design-or-stop optionAn actual stop or feasible or conditionally feasible strategy for the same ResearchQuestionBrief that differs in an answer-changing evidence relation, criticism, validity trade-off, resource use, or refusal condition. A renamed method or more detailed version of the same relation is not another option.
EvidenceSufficientStopA disposition stating that qualified current evidence already meets the brief’s answer condition for the named use, with residual uncertainty and reopen conditions visible. It authorizes no downstream decision.
ResearchDesignDecisionA disposition selecting a worthwhile feasible design family and criticism logic against the actual alternatives, including no new study, with justification, threats, constraints, external results, refusal conditions, and useful stop. It asserts no performed Work or obtaining result.
PostSelectionNeedA finite, explicit item still needed to instantiate, record, schedule, or support the selected design whose every admissible resolution leaves the selected family and core criticism logic unchanged. The set may be explicitly none.
ResearchDesignHoldA disposition withholding a particular selection still needed because one named missing or unresolved external result can change the family, core contrast, observation/source admissibility, criticism logic, feasibility, or refusal. It does not commission obtaining that result.
QualifiedNoNewStudyA completed current research-allocation answer selecting no new study, with the insufficient evidence or bounded answer retained and the reason no worthwhile obtainable study is selected. A material unknown may remain a limitation or reopen condition; it is not automatically an awaited result.
selection-changing uncertaintyAn unresolved value for which two plausible owner results lead to different serious strategies, criticism logics, or a stop/refusal. It cannot be hidden as operational detail.
expected information gainThe answer-changing reduction in uncertainty or discrimination among live claims expected from an option, relative to its cost, risk, constraints, and useful stop. It need not be a single number.

Recognition is cheap: a team has a qualified question and an open choice about further inquiry. Assurance is stricter: real options address the same brief, a selected strategy has its load-bearing owner results, and the returned disposition keeps evidence adequacy separate from the current research commitment.