Library / Research Method Practice Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 03:50:10 UTC

RMP.2:3 - Forces

  • Existing evidence can make a new study wasteful, while residual uncertainty alone does not show that evidence is sufficient.
  • Unlike designs protect different claims, while a common score can erase the exact criticism each enables.
  • Real alternatives expose favorite-method capture, while a fixed option quota can manufacture decorative comparisons.
  • Domain, ethics, safety, access, and authority results are external, while their values may determine which design is possible.
  • Early design selection gives direction, while a load-bearing unknown can make that direction fictional.
  • Operational detail can wait, while “we will solve it later” often hides a selection-changing premise.
  • Expected information gain supports proportionate Work, while uncertain gain cannot always be reduced to one probability or utility number.
  • Mixed designs can connect unlike evidence relations, while adding methods does not guarantee triangulation or agreement.
  • Reporting guidance improves transparency, while a checklist cannot choose or validate a design.
  • The receiver needs relevance, while research must not inherit the receiver’s decision authority.