Link to current text
RMP.2:3 - Forces
- Existing evidence can make a new study wasteful, while residual uncertainty alone does not show that evidence is sufficient.
- Unlike designs protect different claims, while a common score can erase the exact criticism each enables.
- Real alternatives expose favorite-method capture, while a fixed option quota can manufacture decorative comparisons.
- Domain, ethics, safety, access, and authority results are external, while their values may determine which design is possible.
- Early design selection gives direction, while a load-bearing unknown can make that direction fictional.
- Operational detail can wait, while “we will solve it later” often hides a selection-changing premise.
- Expected information gain supports proportionate Work, while uncertain gain cannot always be reduced to one probability or utility number.
- Mixed designs can connect unlike evidence relations, while adding methods does not guarantee triangulation or agreement.
- Reporting guidance improves transparency, while a checklist cannot choose or validate a design.
- The receiver needs relevance, while research must not inherit the receiver’s decision authority.