fpf.tools
Library / Research Method Practice Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 1139–1153

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:45:20 UTC

RMP.3:7 - Conformance Checklist

Use this checklist to examine the operational specification, not as a substitute for the domain Methods it relies on.

  • The practitioner can recover a compatible question, current frame and selected design, with their criticism and useful-stop conditions.
  • Each consequential operation has a recoverable question-relative reason and the units, context and timing needed to use its material.
  • Measurement, source, analysis and practical-owner results are identified with their applicable conditions; proposed results are not represented as supplied.
  • The specification distinguishes intentions from performed analysis and states the records required before relevant information is lost.
  • Commitment and amendment timing is recoverable relative to the information already available. Legitimate adaptation remains method-appropriate.
  • Unresolved operational choices satisfy the RMP.2 joint-input condition; a blocked action is named even when design selection remains valid.
  • A defeated selection premise returns to RMP.2; a changed question returns to RMP.1; independent permission and resource decisions return to their owners.
  • The result states which work is executable, which part is still unsupported and what will permit a return or continuation.

For a disputed or consequential use, follow one proposed observation from its actual unit and procedure through the planned comparison to the error it is supposed to expose. Then test the least favourable jointly admissible unresolved conditions. Correctly filled fields do not answer either question.