RMP.5:5.1 - The seal model runs, but the field claim is still open

A Pump-P4 analysis uses a model calibrated on accelerated-test observations. The retained code, data and environment reproduce the reported degradation curve. The proposed conclusion is that the model justifies extending the field maintenance interval.

The consequential connection is from the calibrated model output to field degradation. The available account supports the computation under the stated inputs. It contains no qualified comparison showing that the accelerated and field conditions preserve the mechanism relevant to this use. The returned ClaimCandidate therefore reports the reproduced model result and its domain of calculation; the field-relevance claim remains unresolved. The criticism account names the unsupported transfer instead of treating reproducibility as validation.

If an already supplied parameter examination shows that plausible material values reverse the proposed comparison, retain that further sensitivity limit. Re-running the same fixed inputs cannot answer it. RMP.6 can compare useful sensitivity or field-validation work, but the current qualified model answer can finish without buying either. The maintenance authority retains the interval decision.