RMP.6:4.5 - Return the current decision and specify only selected work
Choose the result that the current facts warrant:
| Present condition | Result |
|---|---|
| An adequate existing examination answers the selected credibility question | Return that answer, its basis and the qualification needed for use. |
| An additional examination has a relevant contribution and a worthwhile obtainable arrangement | Select the comparison and state what its possible results would change, its required inputs, criterion and remaining limits. |
| The present question can finish without additional testing | Return the supported claim, narrowing, refusal or explicit uncertainty with the reason or limitation the receiver needs. Infeasibility or low value of testing does not improve the evidence. |
| A missing input prevents this particular selection | Name the exact result, owner interface, affected choice and condition for reconsidering it. A missing-input return does not commission obtaining it. |
These are current answers, not mandatory documents. A material unknown can remain a limitation of a completed no-new-test answer when no acquisition is selected. Use a hold only for the particular selection it actually prevents.
For selected new work, make the proposed comparison executable and interpretable before relying on it. State the target claim, material and design correspondence, relevant Method, criterion or tolerance, possible interpretation-changing differences, obtaining arrangement and useful stop. A new or changed design may need RMP.2; consequential operational choices may need RMP.3. Actual conduct and deviations need an adequate RMP.4 trace.
The selected examination remains prospective. Its specification and permitted arrangement do not establish that it was performed or that it produced a favorable result.