fpf.tools
Library / Research Method Practice Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 2631–2642

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:01:07 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:04:31 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:15:20 UTC

RMP.9:7 - Conformance Checklist

Check the conclusion at its claimed reach, using the ordinary work result:

  • Does the research use and observed difficulty identify the actual subject of retention or change?
  • Does an existing adequate basis already settle the question or support a determinate correction?
  • If further evidence is selected, can it change the decision, is it attainable, and does its whole burden make sense?
  • If evidence remains insufficient, is the unsupported use restricted rather than silently qualified?
  • Does the conclusion distinguish proposed change, actual performance, qualification and observed consequence?
  • Does a changed Method retain the necessary variant, provenance, receiving-condition and recovery distinctions?
  • Can the actual consumer apply the warranted consequence while unaffected results and receiving authority remain intact?