Relate unlike contributions and return the limitation

If residents also receive other catchment studies and interpretations, RMP.7 asks which question each can answer. A missed local paired-event comparison does not reappear because another catchment has a similar chart. A qualified cross-catchment comparison may support a stated transfer or narrower common pattern, while participation accounts answer a different question. Preserve those contexts, dependence and missing premises.

If a briefing attributes the local anomaly to one source beyond the supplied evidence, RMP.8 retains the supported downstream pattern and removes that unsupported causal assertion. It returns the particular uncertainty to the environmental receiver. A synthesis of participation experiences can separately inform the group’s account of distrust; it cannot supply a population frequency or estimate remediation effects. The group’s data authority and the regulator’s response decision remain at their own owners.