fpf.tools
Library / Research Method Practice Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 2965–2976

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:10:03 UTC

Available repertoire and scope

ContributionPatternIDsAvailable result and scope
Question, current frame, and design/stopRMP.1–RMP.2An exact source/owner answer or research question, then EvidenceSufficientStop, ResearchDesignDecision with genuine PostSelectionNeed, ResearchDesignHold or QualifiedNoNewStudy for the current selection.
Operationalization and traceRMP.3–RMP.4Question-preserving operationalization or an exact obstacle/return, and a trace for its named examination with explicit limitations. These results come from their respective Methods, not from design selection alone.
Analysis, criticism, and credibilityRMP.5–RMP.6A bounded claim with method-appropriate criticism, and a relevant credibility decision with interpretation of an actual test result when supplied. Either can finish the present question.
Synthesis, episteme revision, and evidence returnRMP.7–RMP.8A warranted corpus answer, including an adequate existing synthesis or useful refusal, and an exact knowledge revision with its bounded receiving return.
Research Method and practice improvementRMP.9Supported retention, correction or change for the named research use, or a restricted/stopped unsupported use. Relevant Method Engineering and field contributions retain their own scope.

This first edition contains all nine RMP patterns. A complete repertoire provides their Methods, not the case-specific evidence, competence or authority needed to use them. A missing external contribution remains a precise limitation on the dependent result.