| A passing ResearchQuestionBrief is treated as approval to begin the favored test. | Use RMP.2 to justify the design and obtain the actual owner results. The brief establishes the epistemic question, not permission or a selected strategy. |
| The brief, design, protocol or trace looks complete, but its question, source frame, material or receiving use differs from the contribution it relies on. | Compare the shared premises at the connection and return the changed question or missing compatibility result. Individually detailed accounts do not repair the mismatch. |
| Every component of a mixed design is feasible, so the combination is declared feasible. | Check shared capacity, burdens, access windows, and the integration claim for the whole set, as in the twelve-day example. |
| A missed comparison is carefully recorded but the original claim remains unchanged. | Preserve the loss and return the defeated design premise. The trace can support a narrower examination without restoring absent evidence. |
| A final reconstructed protocol is called a prospective commitment. | Preserve the actual evidential basis and timing. A useful reconstruction cannot establish an earlier decision that its sources do not support. |
| A public summary is treated as equivalent to the protected original for every criticism. | State which examination each available view supports; obtain permitted access or narrow the receiving use. |
| A repeated computation is treated as evidence that the model is adequate for any field use. | Preserve the computational result and examine the claimed model-to-field relation under RMP.5/RMP.6. |
| A selected credibility test is treated as an actual result. | Preserve the decision, actual performance and returned evidence as different facts. |
| A corpus count is treated as independent corroboration or unlike results as one magnitude. | RMP.7 recovers contributions and the justified transformation before synthesis. |
| A correction changes the event or leaves a dependent model claim unqualified. | RMP.8 matches the assertion and reconciles its actual dependent uses. |
| A selected Method trial is treated as a qualified improvement, or its cost makes unsupported use appear adequate. | RMP.9 keeps acquisition worth, performed evidence and Method adequacy separate. Restrict the unsupported use and preserve the affected claim’s limit. |