Representative case coverage
| Case family | Available RMP coverage | Preserved outside result |
|---|---|---|
| corporate accelerated seal evidence | Routine qualification versus mechanism-validity question; current-evidence stop; design alternatives and joint-input test; mechanism-relative operational choices, repeated-observation units, marker failure return and damaged-specimen trace; analysis qualified by the field relation and a credibility choice that separates computational reproduction from validation for maintenance use. | Failure truth, instrument validity, safety/access, assurance, and maintenance decision. |
| citizen urban-stream salinity | Monitoring versus unresolved anomaly; holder-neutral membership; current-evidence stop; design alternatives and holds; site-period operationalization, missed-event return, a trace separating downstream inspection from an unavailable paired comparison, a bounded descriptive claim, and the limit of a later season as a test of the missed event. | Environmental truth, sampling competence, safe/legal access, laboratory result, and regulatory response. |
| historical factory-closure account | Authenticated-source stop versus source-critical question; historical/synthesis alternatives; provenance/access hold; question-relative source selection, inspected-source trace, contrary material and archival-loss consequences; an explanation narrowed or defeated by an authenticated counter-source and corroboration chosen for the surviving claim. | Archive rights, provenance facts, harm constraints, and public/institutional action. |
| computational/model question | Distinct design and credibility questions; operational input/model/environment choices, run-specific provenance, substantial human/AI contribution and the limits of unavailable service replay; model-relative interpretation, defensible analytic sensitivity and explicit distinctions among reproduction, replication and use validation. | Domain model truth, validation target, compute/data/code access, and receiving engineering decision. |
| contested evidence corpus | Question-led eligibility and trace; recovery of reports, studies and dependence; compatible quantitative combination, structured refusal, situated and mixed synthesis; exact revision and return with retained uncertainty. | Domain appraisal and synthesis criteria, access/rights and the receiver’s authority. |
| research Method and implementation | Suitable Method retained after a determinate calculation correction; affected analysis and claim returned; a materially changed receiving situation can justify a comparison whose actual qualification remains unresolved. Reflexive, historical and mixed cases preserve their own criteria. | Field criteria, actual comparison evidence, competence, source access, Method qualification and receiving authority. |
These are use probes and reader examples. They establish no performed study, actual claim, effectiveness, recognition, or downstream use.