SIE.3:5.2 - Extend an Inspection Model
A constructed product-definition and inspection integration asks: “What observation concerns requirement Q for feature F in configuration R?” The source model already describes the feature and its requirement, but represents no actual observation.
| Model content | Development and case |
|---|---|
| Existing feature and requirement | Reuse their qualified definitions and configuration applicability. |
| Observation | Add the actual observation as distinct from its plan and the requirement being checked. |
| Observation relation | State which configured feature and applicable requirement it concerns. |
| Unit and time | Express the interpretation required for this observation and question. |
| Counterexamples | A planned inspection is not an observation; an observation of another configuration does not answer this question. |
The domain participants confirm those distinctions and identify any unresolved source-specific interpretation. The module can then supply SIE.4 and SIE.7 with the required meanings. In an AP242/QIF installation, its actual profiles, configuration relations, and inspection meanings must come from the qualified source results; the constructed model above is the working example, not a claim about a particular exchange’s conformance.