SYSE.10:7 - Conformance Checklist

• The receiving decision, alternatives, deciding Agent, consequence, and claim are named.
• The claim has a subject, configuration, environment, use, interval, scale, criterion, and stronger nearby claim that remains unsupported.
• Theory, model, simulation, experiment, trial, observation, evidence use, assurance, and decision remain different objects or relations.
• Source editions, Work, performer, Method, model assumptions, physical grounding, observations, measurement uncertainty, and transfer limits are recoverable to the degree the reliance needs.
• Each evidence use states its target claim, polarity, scope, provenance, relevance window, supported use, and unsupported use; causal reliance uses C.28.
• Rival explanations, common assumptions, contradictions, negative results, configuration mismatch, and affected-System evidence have been sought in proportion to the decision consequence.
• The assessment states what is supported, contradicted, narrowed, or unresolved and how the decision changes; it is not treated as authority or acceptance.
• A further local probe comes from C.11, an experiment set or sequence from a specialist Method, and the stopping and reopen conditions are explicit.