SYSE.15:9 - Consequences

The project gains an inspectable repertoire without repeatedly importing or rejecting whole frameworks. Useful combinations become visible, representative Work exposes limiting contributions, and a changed source or condition reopens only the affected choice. Capability, provider, platform, and culture decisions receive named gaps instead of Method-shaped ambiguity.

The cost is real comparison and trial Work. Some source cues remain unresolved, some Methods cannot be safely decomposed, and evidence from one project may not transfer. Recording those limits is more useful than hiding them behind a universal process name.