fpf.tools
Library / Systems Engineering Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 6567–6602

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:20:09 UTC

SYSE.23:12 - Relations

  • Receive a compatible SYSE.22 result containing the project focus, selected problem portfolio, System-family options, supported correspondences, unresolved mismatches, and replayable ChoiceResult. Accept or qualify that account even when its ChoiceRule permits a choose, reject, or reroute result instead of an experiment decision. If a needed input is missing, state which SYSE.23 decision it blocks. The input selects neither the claim subject nor the architecture investment.
  • Use SYSE.3 for the recursive realization arrangement; SYSE.6 for the current engineered-System architecture; SYSE.7 for descriptions and provenance; SYSE.10 for evidence; SYSE.12 for engineering-platform capabilities; SYSE.13 for configuration and effectivity; SYSE.15 for the Method repertoire; and SYSE.20 for Method-and-Work structures. Each result keeps its own subject and use boundary.
  • Use C.25 only after the quality bearer and Q-Bundle have been recovered. Use C.30 for obtaining architecture relations and selected structures, C.32.ACS for a small project criteria set, C.32.HCS for family-specific starter material, and C.32.MWA for several non-isomorphic Method, Work, subject, dependency, and cultural structures. None supplies the engineering decision that compares changes to the project system-of-interest and builder arrangement by itself.
  • Use C.18 for archive and Front claims, C.11.CRC for finite configuration-relative contribution comparisons, and C.11 for the later choice. Keep generation, selection, architecture, capability, Work result, implementation, observation, and causal attribution distinct.
  • Supply revision feedback to SYSE.3, SYSE.6, SYSE.11, SYSE.12, SYSE.15, or SYSE.20 only when later evidence crosses a stated limit or changes an assumption of the receiving result. Feedback is an input to another decision, not an automatic stage.
  • Supply SYSE.23 → SYSE.21 only with a bounded Method or arrangement variant and observations relevant to later cultural work. A project choice or successful change establishes no transmission, cultural selection, or retention.
  • Send a human capability demand to Human Capability Development only for a named human holder population, target Work, support arrangement, capability evidence, and horizon. Do not treat an AI or robot as a human holder, or turn a platform, Method, assignment, organization, or authority relation into a capability of that human population. Use A.15.1 and F.6 for actual Work performance and attribution, and use the pattern that defines the named assignment or authority relation.
  • For organization or assignment reconfiguration, continuing flow and capacity, Method construction, or service intervention and restored use, use the relevant DPF result when available. Otherwise name the specialist help that is missing and use a qualified source. Similar change language does not merge Organization Change Engineering, Operations Management, Method Engineering, and Maintenance Engineering.