SYSE.7:9 - Consequences
Benefits. Decisions can use several specialist descriptions with their different boundaries intact. Contradictions become claim-sized and actionable. Model, configuration, and evidence changes reopen bounded uses rather than the whole project. Publication can be tailored to actual readers without changing source claims. Automation can check more relations because the relation kinds and subjects are explicit.
Costs. Engineers must maintain subject identity, editions, interpretation, configuration applicability, and selected correspondences. Some attractive links will remain unsupported. Specialists must expose enough of their assumptions for the receiving decision, and the integration team must understand where formal checks stop.
Risks. The account can itself grow into a master-model bureaucracy. Prevent this by requiring a receiving decision for every maintained entry and by retiring a relation when no current Work relies on it. Conversely, aggressive minimization can omit a slow feedback channel—for example, a physical, affected-System, or specialist channel; the result check therefore asks what decision would become unsound if the omitted claim failed.