Decide whether the change is worth obtaining

Compare the complete arrangements over the same horizon. Charge discovering and checking a withdrawal schedule, guided targets, teacher or creator work, fitting, failed alternatives, adaptive trials, final assessment and maintenance. C.11.DUA selects further inquiry only when its possible effect on this choice warrants that burden. C.11.MV supplies the situated Method-worth comparison.

For the finite fixture, a deterministic converter is also available as a construction alternative: divide a known millisecond amount by 1,000 or multiply minutes by 60. It gives correct interpretation throughout the two-class envelope. The following stipulated per-task costs include continuing execution, the current-rule read, reporting and allocated maintenance. The learning preparation cost of 30 comprises 8 for qualified targets, 10 for adaptive comparison, 4 for fitting and 8 for final assessment. Converter preparation is 8; the existing guide needs no new preparation. All values use the same example-specific cost unit.

Under the stipulated floor and cost objective, retain the guide for two tasks and obtain the converter for 100. The learned candidate demonstrates an obtainable update and successful later use, but the converter dominates it on these supplied costs and result rates. Keep that alternative when the relevant input envelope really admits it. A broader interpretation problem, unavailable implementation or different preparation burden reopens the comparison. If the evidence needed to choose a withdrawal costs more than retaining adequate help, retain the help for the current horizon.