When the conditions change
| Changed condition | Consequence for the next move |
|---|---|
| Another accessible provider already supplies the required construction. | Repair access or allocation before prescribing learning to every team. Keep any independently required human judgement explicit. |
| Teams can reconstruct the method but the proposed tool’s adoption cost exceeds its useful contribution. | Keeping their current practice is a valid result. Rejection alone is not proof of resistance or incapability. |
| Recognition rewards polished outputs while errors in unfamiliar cases remain hidden. | Use DTM.7 to trace how the visible output earns further use and whether that support sustains the mismatch. ME.16 introduces a justified change. More instruction alone may leave the reward rule unchanged. |
| The new procedure succeeds only in a course or demonstration. | Compare the receiving task and support with the course conditions. In music and dance, MDPE.21 and MDPE.22 address the performance and environment relations; their musical and bodily conditions remain specific to that practice. |
The same distinction matters for a shared technical reference: its descriptions can be copied without exhausting them, while question answering and revision work can exhaust the maintainers’ time. Arrange the question-answering and revision work needed for continued use. A support agreement is one result; continuing production of useful methods is another.
Finish with the supported continuation or change, the contributions it needs and the uncertainty it leaves. A local successful attempt establishes neither wider uptake nor a lasting cultural improvement. If that stronger conclusion matters, obtain the corresponding observations; otherwise use the present result.