Available construction is different from a qualified result
This separate C.2.1 demonstrative episteme concerns Gd, the exact structure just described. It claims that current work can stay blocked while construction becomes available, and that bad feedback, unknown transfer and completed construction change different continuations. Its ReferenceScheme resolves Td/Hd/Rd/Fd/Ld, the three continuations, four relation occurrences, condition letters, S/N/U and Wd/D0–D3 to that description. The table gives every candidate judgement, with its case/window, applicable constraint, condition values and reason. The description supplies the ordered participants, affirmative polarity, subject and source basis, and dependent occurrences.
| Judgement | Case, window, applicable test and relation basis | Evaluated conditions | Result and reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| D0-PerformCurrent | D0 / Wd; PerformCurrent constraint and its relations | o=N, k=S | Disabled: a live operational contribution is missing. |
| D0-ConstructRevision | D0 / Wd; ConstructRevision constraint and its relations | n=S, h=S, z=S, f=S, t=S | Enabled: the selected repair has its diagnostic, access, feedback and transfer basis. |
| D0-QualifyRevision | D0 / Wd; QualifyRevision constraint and its relations | y=N, j=S, f=S, t=S | Disabled: there is no constructed candidate yet. |
| D1-PerformCurrent | D1 / Wd; PerformCurrent constraint and its relations | o=N, k=S | Disabled: the operational gap remains. |
| D1-ConstructRevision | D1 / Wd; ConstructRevision constraint and its relations | n=S, h=S, z=S, f=N, t=S | Disabled: the feedback predicate is false. |
| D1-QualifyRevision | D1 / Wd; QualifyRevision constraint and its relations | y=N, j=S, f=N, t=S | Disabled: both the candidate and qualified feedback are absent. |
| D2-PerformCurrent | D2 / Wd; PerformCurrent constraint and its relations | o=N, k=S | Disabled: the operational gap remains. |
| D2-ConstructRevision | D2 / Wd; ConstructRevision constraint and its relations | n=S, h=S, z=S, f=S, t=U | Unknown: the receiving-transfer basis is unknown. |
| D2-QualifyRevision | D2 / Wd; QualifyRevision constraint and its relations | y=N, j=S, f=S, t=U | Disabled: no constructed candidate exists; transfer is also unknown. |
| D3-PerformCurrent | D3 / Wd; PerformCurrent constraint and its relations | o=N, k=S | Disabled: construction has not supplied the missing live contribution. |
| D3-ConstructRevision | D3 / Wd; ConstructRevision constraint and its relations | n=N, h=S, z=S, f=S, t=S | Disabled: the selected construction is complete, so that repair need no longer obtains. |
| D3-QualifyRevision | D3 / Wd; QualifyRevision constraint and its relations | y=S, j=S, f=S, t=S | Enabled: a candidate and independent applicable final cases have qualified feedback and transfer grounds. |
D0 permits construction while performance lacks its live contribution. D1 defeats construction because feedback rewards a false effect; repairing that predicate can reopen only its dependent uses. D2 leaves the transfer-dependent construction unknown: obtain receiving-interface evidence rather than treating sandbox behavior as its substitute. D3 permits independent assessment, not deployment or successful performance.
Changing feedback truth, a live contribution or candidate availability changes the case. Changing the selected relation, constraint or question requires identifying the changed structure. A sandbox exercise that makes no receiving-transfer claim may remain useful under its own conditions; it cannot waive t in this receiving-use structure. Gd does not measure the repair’s gain, select the best development arrangement or resolve current permission. Those answers come from the connected explanation, the actual suppliers and their evidence.