What FPF is not
FPF is not:
- an AI-agent framework, agent runtime, orchestration library, memory service, or autonomous-action permission;
- a software-coding framework, although software-intensive Systems are legitimate engineering subjects;
- a prescribed workflow, project-management methodology, lifecycle, or universal sequence of stages;
- a checklist bureaucracy or a compliance scheme built around official standards;
- a claim that one school, standard, toolchain, model, or institutional consensus is the whole state of the art;
- a replacement for domain expertise, direct observation, experiment, measurement, professional judgement, or legally valid authority;
- a demand that a human read the full specification before obtaining a useful result;
- a guarantee that every project needs every pattern or every DPF.
FPF is most useful when the cost of semantic drift, hidden assumptions, premature convergence, lost handoffs, ungrounded AI output, weak architecture decisions, evidence gaps, rework, or unreviewable collective Work exceeds the cost of using a disciplined pattern language.