fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 26054–26067

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:17:34 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 10:20:08 UTC

A.14:2 - Problem — what breaks without these distinctions?

If we only have “generic partOf” plus Component/Constituent, five classes of errors appear:

  1. Conservation errors. Counting “20 L of fuel from Tank A” as a component supplies no measure, additivity or conservation account for additions and removals. Establish the common measure and boundary under :5.1, then reconcile the remaining fuel with the actual additions and removals under the applicable conservation law.

  2. Aspect creation by wording. A selected Characteristic, view, projection, partition rule, dashboard slice, or concern label is turned into a world-side part without identifying the aspect, bearer, facet rule, or identity condition.

  3. Temporal smearing. Flattening “before/after” for one enduring carrier into a timeless whole collapses history; treating two changed epistemes or two Work occurrences as temporal pieces of that carrier collapses identity and occurrence history. Resolve those identities and Work relations before temporal aggregation (B.1.4) or Method composition (B.1.5).

  4. Identity confusion. Modelling a “new version” as a component or phase lets a label decide identity. For an episteme, first compare the C.2.1 identity triple and then test edition continuity separately; for another enduring holon, apply its direct identity rule to determine whether the same individual persists or a reidentification question opens.

  5. System-role leakage. A local system-role kind, assignment, or relation-position label is put into a part tree (“the PumpRole is part of the plant”), making structural reasoning brittle.