A.19.SPR:8 - Relations
The dependency and distribution detail belongs here, after the working method. A.19.SPR builds on E.10, E.10.ARCH, E.10.MOVE, A.19, A.3.3, A.2.5, A.15.5, C.2.2a, A.10, B.3, A.20, A.21, C.27, C.29, E.17, E.9.DA, E.21, and F.18. It coordinates with A.17, A.18, C.16, C.16.P, C.16.Q, A.6.P, C.2.P, C.30.P, E.8, E.19, and E.11 when those patterns define or test the recovered claim.
| Pattern | Contribution |
|---|---|
E.10, E.10.ARCH | Recognize the wording problem and keep one shared restoration architecture. |
E.10.MOVE | Resolves ambiguous readiness-like wording before it exits to A.19.SPR or a direct pattern. |
A.2.5, A.15.5 | Distinguish assignment-state predicate, world-side relation, assertion episteme, and the separate work-entry readiness result. |
A.19, A.3.3, C.16.P | Define characteristic-space, dynamics, and characteristic or scale claims when those are the actual subject. |
C.2.P, C.2.2a, A.16.*, E.17 | Define source, publication, and language-state claims. |
A.10, B.3 | A.10 recovers provenance and bounded reliance; B.3 governs assurance claims. Each support relation retains its direct defining pattern. |
A.20, A.21 | Define constraint or adjudication results and distinct gate decisions. |
C.27, C.29 | Define temporal-claim and mathematical-lens uses, including their local fields. |
E.9.DA, E.21, E.19 | Define DRR adequacy, pattern-quality results, and review or admission profiles. |
F.18, F.19 | Settle durable names after the claim is known and rewrite the final practitioner path in plain technical language. |
E.11 | Places first-use cues without creating a second routing table. |