Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:55:20 UTC

A.2.1:4.7 - Direct Neighboring Relations

Current questionDirect exitWhy it stays separate
Does the holder count under the system-role kind?A.2, C.3.2Classification is a four-input judgment, not assignment obtaining.
Can the holder do the Work?A.2.2 capability and fitAssignment does not create ability.
Does the assignment satisfy a state predicate?A.2.5State has its own predicate, relation occurrence, and truth interval.
Which Method admits or organizes the Work?A.3, A.15Method and MethodDescription do not assign a holder.
Was Work performed under this assignment?A.13, A.15.1, F.6Use A.13 to identify the actual performer and A.15.1 to admit the dated Work independently. Because this question explicitly asks under which assignment the Work was performed, F.6 then checks that separate relation against the assignment already used by A.13.
Does a decision or installation help constitute this species?the direct domain relation and species predicateIt matters only when the admitted species says so; an episteme is not a generic participant.
Is the holder responsible, committed, permitted, authorized, or able to access something?the admitted direct domain predicate, A.2.8, A.2.8.PER, or missing-governorEvaluate the claim about the holder using the direct predicate and its declared participants. The assignment can supply an applicability ground where specified.
What supports use of the assignment claim?evidence, reliance, provenance, source-use, or publication patternSupport concerns the assertion; it does not make the relation obtain.
Does a model-use structure change this receiving interpretation?A.1.1 plus the receiving assertion or useIt is not an optional participant of the assignment family.

Assignment-establishing world-side relations and epistemic support are not interchangeable. A constituting decision or installation occurrence affects a species only when its direct predicate says so. Evidence can support relying on the assertion without constituting the assignment.