A.2:2 - Problem

Without this pattern:

1. one system’s changing contributions are modeled as changes of system identity;
2. a familiar label or taxonomy row is treated as a kind and as proof of membership;
3. kind identity and the membership criterion are treated as the same thing;
4. an assignment is used as a family-wide membership rule, or classification is used to manufacture an assignment;
5. the holder, kind, assignment interval, capability, responsibility, and Work are compressed into one record;
6. matching labels across local practices, sources, or editions are treated as identity or permission for reuse;
7. proposed subkind edges or extension rows create their own membership evidence;
8. ordinary role wording turns epistemes, slots, positions, or interfaces into system-held roles.