A.3.2:4.8 - Composite methods and independent method structures

When claims concern relations among methods, first determine whether the related methods construct one admitted composite U.Method.

If admitted methods are actual method parts whose organization constitutes one composite method under A.3.1 and, when order-sensitive composition is current, B.1.5, the composite U.Method remains the exact EntityOfConcern. A U.MethodDescription can make substantive claims about that composite method’s internal organization without changing its object of concern to an independently selected structure.

Description nodes, workflow boxes, code blocks, proof-script blocks, diagram paths, and table rows are representation constituents. They do not become method parts by position in the description. A constituent can participate in method-holon composition only after the recovered object is itself an admitted U.Method.

If a selected relation structure instead connects several methods as alternatives, substitutes, fallbacks, comparison candidates, or members of a family without constituting one composite method, the selected U.Structure is the exact EntityOfConcern under A.22 and C.2.1. The resulting episteme can describe that structure, but the present rule does not classify it as U.MethodDescription.

An algebraic, graph, categorical, process-calculus, effect-calculus, matrix, embedding, distributed, or neural representation can be used to express or analyze either case. Its correspondence to claims is governed separately through C.29. A work plan, work occurrence, method-family registry, or selector result also keeps its own governed object and subject pattern.