| Identity dossier before narrative | Ordinary teaching or orientation stalls before anyone receives a useful account. | Draft the smallest reader-useful sequence and source comparison first; open exact identity only when a named receiving use triggers it. |
| Good story as source replacement | The narrative is memorable, but later users cannot recover the selected source structure. | Add the compact note or exact case appropriate to the use: selected structures, preservation/loss, bounded use, and source return. |
| Tacit selection as narrative success | The author or model picked structures, but no one can explain why they serve this reader. | Reconstruct the selection rationale and reader-use hypothesis; keep the output orientation-only until they are clear. |
| Sequence by habit | Chronology, textbook order, or dramatic order is used without saying why it helps or what it hides. | State the ordering/connective account and compare it with the source. |
| Engagement as evidence | Attention, transportation, or emotional uptake is treated as stronger truth or permission. | Keep engagement as a bounded use effect; use A.10, B.3, or D.1–D.5 only for the specific evidence, assurance, or ethics claim. |
| Narratology word import | Plot, focalization, voice, protagonist, suspense, or narrator are treated as automatic Core kinds. | Keep domain vocabulary in narrative practice unless a separate Core decision admits a reusable distinction. |
| Generated narrative by fluency | LLM output is accepted because it reads coherently. | Compare it with admitted source claims, use C.35 when the generated result is intended to inform architecturing, and open exact NAR only if the receiving use requires it. |