A.6.3.NAR:9 - Consequences

Positive consequences:

• A reader receives a usable sequence before formal identity work is required.
• Selection, ordering, connective additions, loss, and return remain inspectable.
• Exact episteme and source-chain discipline remains available when independent travel, citation, dispute, material cross-scheme or generated admission, consequential reliance, or another named receiving requirement makes it necessary; publicness alone adds no identity burden.
• Human-authored and generated narratives face the same source-comparison boundary without pretending that their production histories are the narrative relation.
• FPF Core stays small while narratology, NLG, pedagogy, and storycraft details mature in their own domains.

Costs and trade-offs:

• Authors must compare the narrative with the source rather than judging it by fluency alone.
• Reliance-facing narratives require exact identity and preservation work proportionate to the receiver’s use.
• Some attractive narratives must be limited to orientation because selected structure or return is not recoverable.
• Evidence, assurance, ethics, or policy claims may add work when they are genuinely current, preventing persuasion from becoming hidden authority.