fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 19577–19586

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:55:15 UTC

A.6.A:4.0 - Trigger rule

Use A.6.A when the intended claim or question remains unclear for the receiving use. The following cues help locate that ambiguity:

  • the prose uses tokens such as affords, invites, calls for, actionable, ready for, ripe for, natural next step, the model wants, the interface tells, this problem asks for;
  • a boundary, gate, incident note, design note, or review note uses such language for admission, selection, triage, or action guidance;
  • different traditions are compared using the same action-first wording;
  • a draft introduces model affordance, interface affordance, actionable insight, policy invitation, or ready for formalization without declared sense;
  • the author intends the phrase to carry more than one of: situational action opportunity, latent cue, operator move, probe move, closure move, or control move.