A.6.A:4.0a - Operational repair sequence

1. Recover the occurrence and receiving use. Read the trigger sentence with its source context. State which interpretation, decision or action the reader needs it for.
2. Compare the live interpretations. Consider a physical opportunity, its detection, an operator prompt, a social response, a candidate inquiry, a proposed clarification, a learned policy tendency or a control option. Also consider an actual evaluation, ability, commitment or Work claim when the sentence supports that reading. Use §4.3 as a menu, not a required classification.
3. Select what the grounds support. State the intended interpretation and why a consequential rival is excluded. If the grounds do not choose, preserve the rival meanings and return the fact or question that would distinguish them. A short note is useful when a later decision needs those grounds; it is not a prerequisite to every repair.
4. Recover the subject and relevant conditions. Name the actual site, would-be actor, action and other participants only to the extent that they determine the claim. For an obtaining relation, recover its direct predicate and any needed occurrence identity under A.6.REL. For an inquiry, state the question and what an answer would resolve. A menu label supplies neither result.
5. Express the first useful result. Return a sufficient ordinary sentence, supported bounded claim, explicit question or exact missing basis. Use one of §4.5’s optional forms only when the receiving use needs it. Separate a detector, viewpoint, source or representation when that distinction changes the result.
6. Continue from that result. Apply the subject pattern for a needed evaluation, Method selection, WorkPlan, actual Work, authority, gate or evidence claim. Use A.6.B for the actual boundary-bearing claim. Stop when the receiving question is answered; wording recovery creates no extra invitation occurrence to establish first.