fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 22889–22905

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:55:15 UTC

A.6.H:4.1 - Entry and result contract

Enter with:

  • one exact sentence or decision that depends on wholeness-family wording;
  • the concrete candidate objects recovered under A.6.P:4.11;
  • the receiving use that would change if the wording were read differently; and
  • any already known definition, constraint, or test and its PatternID locator when that reference must travel.

Return one of:

  1. one or more readable direct claims, each naming the predicate or claim family, ordered participants, material qualification, and the PatternID locator when its defining or testing content must be cited;
  2. one concrete next action for a still-current measurement, evidence-use, episteme, publication, Method, plan, Work, production, or completion question: apply the named rule when its entry holds, or stop when no such question remains; or
  3. an A.6.RCD missing-governor[...] result naming the exact participants, proposed predicate, affected use, and absent definition, applicability, or occurrence-identity rule. Name a future pattern or declaration need only when one is actually identifiable.

When evidence cannot yet select among several readings, keep the candidate objects, discriminating questions, and blocked receiving use explicit in ordinary prose. An ordinary shared note may hold the alternatives, keeping each separately recoverable. A note, table, list, or trace does not by its presence establish a whole, relation occurrence, identity, coverage, assurance result, or new kind.