Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:00:05 UTC

A.6.H:4.2 - Apply the exact-object sequence

Use the following sequence only as far as the current sentence requires:

  1. Recover the working question. State what a reader must decide, do, accept, measure, rely on, start, continue, or stop. The cue word selects no branch.
  2. Name the subject and reference level. Distinguish the referent entity, claim-bearing episteme, publication occurrence, publication form, presentation carrier, Method, MethodDescription, WorkPlan, performed Work, and evidence carrier. Keep only the subjects current in this case.
  3. Recover a candidate whole only for an actual whole claim. Identify the candidate individual, its direct identity pattern, relevant boundary or delimitation, environment, and at least one interaction, dependency, or constraint across that boundary when the use needs it.
  4. Identify the alleged parts independently. A label, location, list, graph node, file section, timestamp, or common name does not by itself establish the claimed parthood. Recover each component, constituent, entity said to belong to a collection, portion, temporal restriction, Method factor, Work part, or other object using the rule that defines or tests that claim.
  5. State every direct relation occurrence separately. Name exact participants and test the direct predicate. A relation obtains neither because the whole was recognized nor because a trace, view, or record lists it.
  6. Add construction or selected structure only when the receiving use consumes it. C.13 may report already recovered parts, relations, constraints, and a construction rule. A.22 may identify one selected structure when its selection basis and identity discriminators are current. Neither creates the direct facts.
  7. Recognize or reidentify the whole only when that question is current. Use A.1 for holon recognition and B.2 for a remaining whole-reidentification question after direct existing-whole explanations have been tested. A changed adjective or part list alone decides neither.
  8. Separate coverage, completion, and performed Work. Name what is covered, under which scope and criterion, by which exact relation, and whether the claim concerns a MethodDescription, capability, plan, Work occurrence, production result, evidence set, or another subject. Apply A.15.1/A.15.PROD or the rule for that exact subject; do not treat a plan as performed Work.
  9. Stop after unpacking. State each recovered whole, relation, characteristic, Work, evidence use, or verdict directly. Apply another named rule only when one exact question remains and its entry holds; otherwise stop with the completed claims or exact blocker.