A.6.H:4.3 - Classify integrity by the claim it carries
The word integrity never chooses mereology by itself.
| Current sentence | First exact objects | Governing exit | Blocked overread |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Structural integrity is measured at X.” | bearer, integrity Characteristic, Scale or coordinate, Unit when needed, measurement method, result, evidence pointer, and time stance | C.16.P, then C.16 and the exact measurement pattern | Do not invent a candidate whole, boundary, parts, or PhaseOf merely because the Characteristic is named integrity. |
| “This report supports the integrity claim.” | exact claim, evidence-bearing episteme or carrier, evidence-use relation, relying use, limitations, and currentness when required | A.10; B.3 only when an assurance claim is current | A report title, provenance link, or measured value is neither assurance nor a whole. |
| “The assembled pump remains an integral whole.” | exact pump, direct identity rule, boundary, independently identified parts, direct assembly or parthood relations, any current selected structure, and the whole-recognition or reidentification question | A.14, C.13, A.22, A.1, or B.2 as selected by the actual claim | The adjective integral, a BoM, or an assembly record does not establish the whole or relations. |
| “Data integrity” or another defined term of art | exact bearer, defined Characteristic or constraint, threat/assumption or qualification basis, and receiving use | the characteristic, constraint, security, measurement, or evaluation pattern | Do not reinterpret the term as structural wholeness unless the sentence separately makes that claim. |
If the source leaves these readings genuinely open, preserve the alternatives and block the named use until evidence discriminates them.