A.6.P.WMR:5.4 - Pump 14: continuing entity and later decision use

A P2W note says, the pressure problem was the input, adjustment was the work, and restored pressure was the result. Keep accepted ProblemCard@Context PC-P14-PRESSURE as the separate problem-side object. Do not say that this accepted pressure-problem claim guided U.WorkPlan WP-P14-2026-07-15: the case supplies no direct relation for that use. Return missing-governor naming the ProblemCard and WorkPlan participants, proposed planning-use predicate, affected planning use, and absent definition; name a future declaration need only if one is identifiable. Do not infer that the problem caused W-P14-ADJUST-1010-1020. A.15.1 identifies that Work; A.3.4 identifies T-P14-PRESSURE-RISE as a bounded change of continuing HydraulicLoop_P14. Exact relation-declaration episteme P14-REL-2026 contains the defining ClaimGraph for AdjustmentWorkCausesPressureRise and MeasurementResultUsedByDecisionWork; separate case facts satisfy both predicates.

Keep four values separate: SetPointAdjustment@PlantOps-v3 is the selected U.Method; an A.3.2 U.MethodDescription episteme carries reusable claims about how that Method is done; WP-P14-2026-07-15 states intended Work; and W-P14-ADJUST-1010-1020 is the dated Work occurrence. Naming any of them neither identifies an additional relation nor makes one obtain, so the unsupported ProblemCard-to-plan guidance claim remains missing-governor.

P14-REL-2026 is available in the current case record. Independently, a separately stipulated world-side fact satisfies its actual-causation predicate, so write: W-P14-ADJUST-1010-1020 caused T-P14-PRESSURE-RISE. In the explicitly earlier case record, P14-REL-2026 is absent; at that epistemic stage, keep that Work and transformation separate and return missing-governor naming both participants, the proposed causation predicate, the affected use, and the absent definition. No receiver or future declaration is required to state that blocker. Separately write: Decision Work D-P14 used measurement-result episteme MR-P14-AFTER as its declared basis. The loop continues; no entity begins, no production-completion criterion is current, and no transformation-composition claim follows. This case demonstrates work-caused change and later epistemic use without a production reading.