A.6.P.WMR:5.5 - Hair styling: a changed referent and an unresolved configuration

A salon record says, hair and gel were inputs; the hairstyle, photo, and satisfaction were outputs. A.15.1 identifies styling Work W-STYLE-27 with affected referent Hair_27; A.3.4 identifies T-HAIR-27 as the arrangement change of that continuing hair. Exact relation-declaration episteme SALON-RESOURCE-USE-2026 contains the defining ClaimGraph for StylingWorkConsumesResource and StylingWorkCausesHairArrangementChange; separate case facts support the work-change claim and, when known, the gel-consumption claim.

Write: Applying A.15.1 identifies W-STYLE-27 with affectedReferent Hair_27, and W-STYLE-27 caused T-HAIR-27 under StylingWorkCausesHairArrangementChange. When the separate consumption fact is present, also write: W-STYLE-27 consumed StylingGel_27 under StylingWorkConsumesResource. Do not yet write EveningArrangement_27 is the resulting configuration: the case has selected neither an A.22 structure, a characteristic-state fact, a relation occurrence, nor a description episteme and therefore has no direct configuration governor. Return that blocker. This case demonstrates a continuing changed entity plus a blocked attempt to turn result into an unnamed configuration kind.

Client_27 is the person receiving the service; Hair_27 is the continuing affected referent. A hair-to-person part claim, a service-recipient claim, or a person-level effect claim needs its own exact direct governor and case fact; naming the client beside the hair establishes none of them. Ordinary styling changes continuing Hair_27 and does not create a new entity. A separately individuated wig, extension, or other artifact may instead open its own identity-inception question under A.15.PROD when its identity rule and inception basis close.

For gel use, distinguish the three stops. With a current StylingWorkConsumesResource governor, a case fact that fails its predicate is factually unsupported, while an unavailable consumption fact is missing-information; an absent conforming declaration, predicate, or applicability condition is missing-governor. A method-description ingredient field or appointment-plan row substitutes for none of those bases. Photo_27 remains separately identified: its identity, photography or record-forming Work, representation of Hair_27, and publication are separate questions. A measured satisfaction response, an evaluation verdict, and any downstream effect of the service likewise require separate predicates and subject patterns; none constitutes the hairstyle or follows from the photo.