A.7:6 - Worked cases

A.7:6.1 - System and episteme

Digital twin and asset. In this example, Twin-e4 is a C.2.1 description episteme about the asset. Maintenance system M updated the asset configuration using Twin-e4. This ordinary sentence keeps the acting System, asset, and episteme visible. If the receiving claim concerns exact Work, carrier change, evidence, source currentness, or an assignment, add those objects and direct relations separately. Twin-e4 supplies the representation used by M; the updating action belongs to M. A cross-plane use cites only its applicable plane relation and policy.

Review and manuscript. Reviewer Dana reviewed Manuscript-e7 and wrote Review-e2. This is valid ordinary actor wording when Dana is a recoverable System and no inference uses assignment identity. PeerReviewGuide-e2 is a MethodDescription only if its exact EntityOfConcern is the PeerReview Method and its claims say substantively how that Method is performed. For a precise audit, use A.13 to identify the review performer and A.15.1 to admit the review Work independently. Add F.6 only if the audit must also identify the assignment under which that Work was performed. Keep the resulting review episteme, manuscript and review carriers, and evidence or source relations separate.

A.7:6.2 - Progressive technical examples

Pump in a cooling loop. Pump P-12 circulated coolant during the 10:00-10:45 run. If that sentence remains ordinary actor wording, no full performance record is required. For a precise Work claim, recover the actual performer and its A.13 core, then use A.15.1 to admit the dated run independently with at least one Method actually followed, the interval, and an obtaining containing-System relation. That core includes an obtaining assignment, here CoolingLoopCirculationAssignment-17, its admitted species, holder and assigned-kind participants. Add F.6 only if the claim must also identify the assignment under which the run was performed. Add Capability and another Method only for their own claims; none follows merely from the noun pump.

Standard used in a design. The design team used Safety Standard S-174 when selecting valve V-12. The standard is an episteme and does not act. Its PDF and printed volume are carriers; name them when the receiving source or evidence claim uses them. Valve Selection SOP v5 is a MethodDescription only after the A.3.2 membership test; the ordinary sentence does not require an assignment. A reliance-bearing Work account uses A.13 to identify the actual performer and A.15.1 to admit ValveSelectionWork-47 independently. Keep its :2 admission basis, including the core assignment and Method actually followed, recoverable. Add F.6 only if the account must also say under which assignment the Work was performed. Evidence use and current source edition remain separate.

Set and team. {Alice, Bob, 3.14} is a set and cannot act. Cooling maintenance team T repaired pump P-12 is ordinary actor wording when T is already recoverable as a collective System. Add its coordination Method, Work occurrence, local system-role kind, or assignment only when the corresponding stronger claim is current.