fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 38815–38829

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 10:39:28 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:40:04 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 11:05:10 UTC

B.1:9 - Consequences

Positive consequences:

  • B.1 can still use useful aggregation apparatus without letting apparatus choose the ontology.
  • Holonic part-whole claims become reviewable.
  • Role, method, work, math-lens, and publication descriptions stop leaking into mereology.
  • B.2 has a cleaner entry condition: whole reidentification, not ordinary improvement rhetoric.

Costs:

  • Users must identify the claim kind before choosing a notation.
  • Some Gamma-heavy examples require a subject pattern before the notation is used: work occurrence evidence uses A.15.1, work-resource aggregation uses B.1.6, mathematical-lens reliance uses C.29, and whole reidentification first uses B.2.P and then B.2 when the problem remains current.
  • Work occurrence analysis requires evidence and timing, not just a method plan.