B.2.3:4.2 - Keep Constitution And Neighboring Relations Separate
The exact ClaimGraph, EntityOfConcern, and effective ReferenceScheme are the three participants of C.2.1’s EpistemeConstitutionRelation. That constitution relation does not by itself identify A.1 constituents or constructive part relations. When A.1 requires those facts, recover them from an exact direct episteme-part or claim-composition pattern. The EntityOfConcern remains an independently governed entity related through aboutness and reference. Keep all other current questions in their direct relations:
- empirical grounding uses
EpistemeEmpiricalGroundingRelationonly when designated empirical claims have current claim-to-world mappings involving the exact grounding holon; - viewpoint selection for a describing use follows
E.10.D2;U.Viewrecognition requiresE.17.0conformance of the exact episteme to an exact viewpoint; - publication occurrence, publication form, carrier, source use, and C.29 representation remain distinct from the episteme and its constitution;
- an exact acting System first has the A.13 core and A.15.1 independently admits its synthesis Work under a Method; F.6 enters only if the receiving transition account also consumes precise assignment-bound attribution through the same obtaining A.13 assignment, while any actual transformation remains a separate claim; and
- evidence and assurance support or challenge exact claims but do not enter episteme identity or establish constitution.
Add only the neighboring object or relation required by the receiving use. Do not infer any of them from a publication set, and do not turn them into extra identity positions.