B.2.3:4.3 - Episteme Trigger Interpretation
When a receiving use has materialized B.2’s optional MHTTriggerProfile, interpret its cues without giving agency to epistemes:
Cue recorded in MHTTriggerProfile | Episteme-case reading | Subject pattern kept visible |
|---|---|---|
| Delimitation change | The knowledge body now has a stable EntityOfConcern, scope, reference scheme, and claim scope. | C.2.1, A.7, source-use patterns |
| Objective or evaluation change | The result episteme contains an answer or evaluation claim for a question that the collection did not answer as one claim-bearing whole. | C.2.1, C.16, E.21 or relevant evaluation pattern |
| Supervision or coordination change | Principles, axioms, invariants, reference schemes, or claim-graph constraints organize how constituent claims are interpreted. | C.2.1, A.6.0, A.6.1, C.29 when formal lens is current |
| Capability or closure claim | The candidate episteme supports a new explanatory, predictive, specification, or coordination use; evidence for that claim remains separate. | C.2.1, C.16, A.10 for evidence use, and the pattern for that use |
| Agency threshold | The episteme remains non-agentive. For an agency-characteristic claim, recover the exact System, characteristic predicate, scope, and window and test the characteristic independently; that characteristic claim does not require an assignment. A precise agency claim requires the separate A.13 core. If dated Work is also claimed, recover each exact performer through A.13 and let A.15.1 independently admit the Work. Add F.6 only when the receiving claim expressly consumes precise assignment-bound attribution; missing or failed F.6 leaves the Work intact. | A.12, A.2.1, A.13, A.19, C.16, A.15.1, F.6 |
| Temporal consolidation | A chronology or source-currentness change prompts inspection of the knowledge body. Test any changed ClaimGraph, EntityOfConcern or effective ReferenceScheme under C.2.1; currentness alone changes none of those identity values. | C.2.1, C.27, G.11, E.17, and source-use patterns |
| Context reframe | New terms, reference schemes, or EntityOfConcern mapping reframe the knowledge body. | C.2.1, A.6.3, A.6.4, F.18 |
These cues identify claims and relations to inspect. They neither constitute the candidate episteme nor select B.2; the direct facts, complete A.1 criterion, C.2.1 constitution test, and B.2 existing-whole/new-whole comparison decide the result.