Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:25:14 UTC

B.4:4.1 - Name the subject and continuity question

Subject kindState before using the shared cycle
SystemName the current System and the relevant continuity or transformation rule. State whether the changed System remains the same System or whether a successor System is identified. Use A.1 for System recognition, A.3.4 for an actual bounded change of the continuing System, and A.15.PROD when the claim concerns first existence through production Work.
EpistemeIdentify the earlier and later epistemes under C.2.1. Assert an EpistemeEditionRelation only when its historical-continuation conditions obtain; otherwise state replacement or another direct relation.
MethodIdentify the current Method under A.3.1. If intended results, participant meanings, admissible conditions, safety bounds, semantic basis, acceptance criteria, or composition change, state whether the result is a refinement, substitute, or distinct successor Method. Use B.1.5 when order-sensitive composition is current.
MethodDescriptionIdentify each exact claim-bearing episteme under A.3.2 and C.2.1, and any obtaining edition relation. A later description does not by itself change the Method it describes.
WorkIdentify each dated occurrence under A.15.1. Completed Work is not revised: later review, repair, deployment, or follow-up is other Work, even when the occurrences belong to one longer effort.

Not every holon is an adaptation-loop subject, and the five branches are not interchangeable. If the continuity or successor relation is still open, keep that question explicit rather than hiding it behind the word evolution.