B.4:4.2 - Separate the changed subject from the acting side

The subject does not observe, refine, or deploy itself by grammatical convenience. A System performs each actual piece of Work. The changed subject, performing System, dated Work, Method enacted by that Work, and result remain distinct. Practitioner prose can still say “the engineer refined the design” or “the controller adjusted the valve” when that recognizable actor and action are enough. If that ordinary sentence is all the receiver needs, do not open a technical Work account. If B.4 identifies one particular dated U.Work occurrence, first recover every actual performer’s A.13 core and independently admit the Work under A.15.1 from its performance history, enacted Method, temporal extent, and containing System. Add F.6 only when the receiving claim also needs precise assignment-bound attribution. A short B.4 account may omit an unused assignment identifier or classification only when every relation it consumes remains recoverable.

The performing System need not be external to the larger holon. For internal adaptation, apply the A.12 reflexive split: identify the changed subsystem or part and the acting subsystem or part as exact, distinct participants, and establish their parthood in the containing holon independently. Use an external System when that is what the case actually has. For any particular dated U.Work, recover every performer’s A.13 core and independently admit the occurrence under A.15.1; add F.6 afterward only when precise assignment-bound attribution is current. Name an assignment in the short B.4 account only when the receiving claim uses its identity. State authority, responsibility, permission, acceptance, or admission through its own direct predicate, actual participants, and applicability basis; neither a phase label nor Work supplies them.