Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:05:11 UTC

B.4:4.3 - Keep the four phase claims distinct

These phases distinguish questions and results, not necessarily disjoint clock intervals. Operation and observation can overlap; state the actual Work occurrences and any result dependencies needed by the transition.

PhaseCurrent questionOutput and boundary
1. OperateHow is the current subject actually operating or being used?Name the current use or operation and any records that actually exist. Monitoring may occur, but a record does not by itself establish an observation, comparison, or change.
2. ObserveWhat do records, measurements, testimony, or other evidence show for the named use?Name the observation, comparison, or interpretation Work. Separately identify the observed basis, finding, hypothesis, or still-unclear cue through the direct result or evidence rule that actually applies; Work has no generic result field. Observe does not yet choose a change.
3. RefineWhat change should be developed and tested in response, and what identity relation would that change have?Name the design, revision, selection, and testing Work. Separately identify the selected candidate and the subject-specific identity question or intended treatment. State a continuity, successor, substitution, refinement, or edition relation only when its exact endpoints exist and its own conditions obtain. Refine does not make the candidate available for renewed use.
4. DeployWhat concrete deployment Work occurred for the selected candidate?Name that Work. Then state separately what actually happened—for example, a changed or produced entity, publication, configuration, release, or availability—using the rule that establishes that fact. Acceptance, admission, and actual later use remain separate facts.

Use explicit transition conditions:

  1. Operate -> Observe: a named cue, question, monitoring result, or review need requires interpretation.
  2. Observe -> Refine: the receiving use has an observed basis or a routed cue from which a change question can be formed.
  3. Refine -> Deploy: one candidate is selected and its subject-specific identity question or intended treatment is explicit. State an obtaining continuity, successor, substitution, refinement, or edition relation here only when both endpoints already exist; otherwise keep the question open until the relevant change or production has occurred.
  4. Deploy -> Operate: actual renewed operation or use begins; availability alone does not close this transition.

Evidence is not a fifth phase. Evidence relations warrant the observed basis, candidate choice, transition, or renewed-use claim when a receiver relies on them. Evidence can be produced or used during several phases without duplicating those phases.