Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:00:05 UTC

C.11.DUA:7 - Conformance Checklist

The following conditions concern the advice actually given. They require no separately completed checklist.

IDCondition
CC-C11DUA.1The receiving question and the action, delay, expenditure or inquiry demanded by the advice are clear enough to judge their contribution.
CC-C11DUA.2The answer preserves what present evidence supports and its use boundary. Infeasible acquisition does not strengthen the claim.
CC-C11DUA.3A live inquiry is judged by its attainable contribution and relevant cost, delay, opportunity cost and downside. Useful qualitative comparison suffices.
CC-C11DUA.4When a requirement’s merits are disputed, the appraisal addresses its governed quantity or activity, purpose, contribution and burden while keeping present force separate.
CC-C11DUA.5The result reaches the first useful completion for this recipient. Its decision and useful basis remain; inactive inquiry adds no placeholder, waiver or omission account.
CC-C11DUA.6Any reason or limitation needed by the decision or a later recipient remains in the same result. Changed use can make previously unnecessary inquiry worthwhile.
CC-C11DUA.7The stated continuation is feasible under obtaining conditions, or the answer identifies the actual impasse. Future authorization or evidence is not treated as obtained.
CC-C11DUA.8Domain inference, choice, ethical and assurance claims retain their direct methods. Explanatory and future-option gains are judged at their receiving horizon.