Link to current text
C.11.DUA:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
| Misuse | Consequence and repair |
| Limitation becomes a study order | An unsupported stronger claim is followed by infeasible acquisition. Preserve the limitation and compare available continuations, as in 5.3. |
| Uncertainty alone justifies investigation | A large unknown consumes resources although resolving it cannot improve this use. Identify the possible change and attainable contribution. |
| Cheapness substitutes for support | A convenient action is presented as validating its premise. Keep the claim boundary and examine whether a check could change the warranted use. |
| Optional inquiry returns as a mandatory waiver | The reader finishes the choice and must then account for unused fields. Make the completion form conditional, as in T0. |
| Every explanation is deleted as overhead | A later recipient mistakes a bounded choice for a general result. Retain the scope explanation that changes that use. |
| Requirement criticism becomes permission | An argued revision is treated as already effective. State present force and the available revision route. |
| Only immediate action counts as value | Useful model discrimination is dismissed. Compare research gains and displaced opportunities at the research horizon. |