C.11:12 - Relations

• Builds on: A.6.P, A.6.5, A.10, A.13, A.18, A.19; coordinates with: E.10.LRN for learning-word recovery, C.11.CRC for a missing finite configuration-relative comparison claim, C.17 for bounded characterization
• Read next when candidate work is needed: C.38 for forming complete ways of obtaining one result, C.39 for a missing explanation of how to obtain it, or C.40 for feasible variation and examination of usable material. Use C.18 when generation-account or archive/front claims are needed.
• Other neighboring questions: C.19 for one explicit pool-policy result over exploration or exploitation governance; C.24 for one enactment-facing call plan or CheckpointReturn; G.5 for the selector-facing result kind that is actually current—retained alternatives, all-member joint use, narrowed handoff, abstain, or escalation; and C.28 when the choice result depends on causal-use support
• Keeps outside: candidate generation, pool-wide exploration or exploitation policy, selector-facing set-result declaration, publication availability, and execution sequencing
• Aligns with: classical evidential decision theory, causal decision theory, success-first or subjunctive repair, bounded-resource metareasoning and probe-cost doctrine, C.28 causal-use question/rung/support vocabulary, active-inference-adjacent decision work, quantum-like contextual repair where context or order effects are real, and multilevel mathematical-lens pressure at the minimal-floor level only