Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:35:13 UTC

C.11:4.3.4 - Active-inference neighboring repair

Bring the active-inference line into view when the chooser is embodied, online, and socially coupled, and when the decision cannot be understood as one disembodied choose-then-act moment.

What changes here is practical choice logic, not one neighboring-school label. The comparison is no longer over one frozen snapshot alone. The comparison must now ask whether one more observation, one more coupled update, or one more socially mediated or role-expectation clarification actually changes what should be done now.

This minimal choice doctrine makes that social-expectation pressure explicit, but it does not yet operationalize one full ROE or SocialExpectationRegime object model inside C.11. If that heavier machinery is itself what the case hinges on, the decision record should say so honestly rather than pretending the local C.11 floor has already settled it.

Typical practical cash-outs are:

  • probe again because one further embodied observation, coupled update, or explicit role-expectation clarification can still change the state estimate enough to reverse the current survivor relation;
  • choose now because delay itself now worsens the state being managed, closes the window in which the preferred option remains feasible, or leaves no lawful time for one more socially mediated check;
  • reroute because the question has already become enactment sequencing or agent-characterization work rather than local choice.

C.11 keeps the choice question visible there, but A.13 still governs the narrower question of what kind of agent or agential system is in play. For measured characteristic and evidence claims, use A.17 for Characteristic identity and arity, A.18 for Scale and Coordinate bindings, A.19 for the declared space and reusable predicate, C.16 for the measurement account, and A.10 for bounded reliance on the evidence. C.24 still governs sequencing and enactment once a choice result has already been fixed.

Do not invoke this line only because one agent is acting in the world. Invoke it when embodied coupling, online updating, or explicit social-expectation pressure actually changes what the chooser should do now from the current OptionSet.